Showing posts with label ideas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ideas. Show all posts

Saturday, 10 October 2015

food for thought, sol le witt


Sentences on Conceptual Art


by Sol Lewitt 

  1. Conceptual artists are mystics rather than rationalists. They leap to conclusions that logic cannot reach.
  2. Rational judgements repeat rational judgements.
  3. Irrational judgements lead to new experience.
  4. Formal art is essentially rational.
  5. Irrational thoughts should be followed absolutely and logically.
  6. If the artist changes his mind midway through the execution of the piece he compromises the result and repeats past results.
  7. The artist's will is secondary to the process he initiates from idea to completion. His wilfulness may only be ego.
  8. When words such as painting and sculpture are used, they connote a whole tradition and imply a consequent acceptance of this tradition, thus placing limitations on the artist who would be reluctant to make art that goes beyond the limitations.
  9. The concept and idea are different. The former implies a general direction while the latter is the component. Ideas implement the concept.
  10. Ideas can be works of art; they are in a chain of development that may eventually find some form. All ideas need not be made physical.
  11. Ideas do not necessarily proceed in logical order. They may set one off in unexpected directions, but an idea must necessarily be completed in the mind before the next one is formed.
  12. For each work of art that becomes physical there are many variations that do not.
  13. A work of art may be understood as a conductor from the artist's mind to the viewer's. But it may never reach the viewer, or it may never leave the artist's mind.
  14. The words of one artist to another may induce an idea chain, if they share the same concept.
  15. Since no form is intrinsically superior to another, the artist may use any form, from an expression of words (written or spoken) to physical reality, equally.
  16. If words are used, and they proceed from ideas about art, then they are art and not literature; numbers are not mathematics.
  17. All ideas are art if they are concerned with art and fall within the conventions of art.
  18. One usually understands the art of the past by applying the convention of the present, thus misunderstanding the art of the past.
  19. The conventions of art are altered by works of art.
  20. Successful art changes our understanding of the conventions by altering our perceptions.
  21. Perception of ideas leads to new ideas.
  22. The artist cannot imagine his art, and cannot perceive it until it is complete.
  23. The artist may misperceive (understand it differently from the artist) a work of art but still be set off in his own chain of thought by that misconstrual.
  24. Perception is subjective.
  25. The artist may not necessarily understand his own art. His perception is neither better nor worse than that of others.
  26. An artist may perceive the art of others better than his own.
  27. The concept of a work of art may involve the matter of the piece or the process in which it is made.
  28. Once the idea of the piece is established in the artist's mind and the final form is decided, the process is carried out blindly. There are many side effects that the artist cannot imagine. These may be used as ideas for new works.
  29. The process is mechanical and should not be tampered with. It should run its course.
  30. There are many elements involved in a work of art. The most important are the most obvious.
  31. If an artist uses the same form in a group of works, and changes the material, one would assume the artist's concept involved the material.
  32. Banal ideas cannot be rescued by beautiful execution.
  33. It is difficult to bungle a good idea.
  34. When an artist learns his craft too well he makes slick art.
  35. These sentences comment on art, but are not art.

First published in 0-9 (New York), 1969, and Art-Language (England), May 1969


Thursday, 19 March 2015

research: rachel whiteread














interested in using photo stills as a /figurative starting point or skeleton for painting work.
Building up layers in a predetermined fashion blocks me, it's the highlighting chance marks, working with what is accidentally there, as well as taking away to reveal colours/marks underneath is what seems to appeal at the moment, especially from my ECG drawings.


Rachel WhitereadB: Clapton Park Estate, Mandeville Street, London E5; Bakewell Court; Repton Court; March 1995 1996



love this final still from the tate website which is taken after a demolition of a building in east london

Friday, 13 March 2015

see what i hear





http://www.everydaylistening.com/articles/tag/visualization

came across this amazing website, great resource with links and nice layout whilst looking into how to recording certain words to create a visual representation.

drawings always repeat to ECG like patterns, repeats, and the grid of the recording paper, at a distance looks pink but red and white close up is something i've come back to in the past when i've used graph paper for chine-colle prints.

have a pad to use up,like the shiny regular quality to it. Always tend to write in black ink which mirrors the traces created.
I used to look at endless traces at work in the past, banal information about the state of someones health but they're unique to everyone.

Thinking about a columnar form/embossed cylinder or stained glass rip-off montage of white embossed paper. 




Sunday, 1 February 2015

murmur returns

















can you see the drones in the last one?...



moon water reflection




back at shapwick heath
some stills this time
amazing reflections and hypnotic formations again
only 3 weeks left before the murmurs are over til next winter
love the delicacy of the way some of the murmurs photos have turned out. tweaked things a bit in iPhoto, the cooler tint is realistic and adds to the chill dreamy quality of the 'blue hour'.


There's a certain voyeuristic nature to watching these formations, it's an experience that my video work is trying to capture and that I'm having to distill down and analyse as the course progresses.

The noise, the goosebumps, the involuntary smile, the wonder.

It's all based on being there when something else is doing something, about being present and outside at the same time.















Friday, 16 January 2015

distractions










easily distracted in the studio
i might just have needed a coffee and some chocolate but hypnotised by the blinds? 
WTF!
and it's bloody white
some things never change

Thursday, 15 January 2015

islands and rivers



islands and rivers




i'd seen footage of murmurations before but this clip by islands and rivers that went viral last year gave me goosebumps and stuck in my mind.
at the same time I'd come across some black and white still images from a guardian mag of the shapes,
this also coincided with doing a nightly drawing in a diary before I went to sleep. the idea was I would be thinking about the day and using a biro see what came out, often the shapes and drawings reminded me of flocks of birds and the starling mumurations.

all these links have been going over in my head unconsciously,.
when thinking about my next project, there's a pleasing parallel between the starlings roosting nightly, settling and getting comfortable and me doodling to settle my mind to help me sleep.

Thursday, 18 December 2014

ideas: japanese designer Naoya Matsumoto- working with light and paper

Local studio Naoya Matsumoto Design created the small Yorunoma bar behind a typical glass shopfront in the Abeno-Ku ward of Osaka.

The crinkly surfaces were formed from lengths of rumpled tracing paper, sculpted by the designer and local residents to achieve a textured, rock-like appearance across the angular walls and ceiling.

http://www.naoyamatsumoto.com/


article from : http://www.dezeen.com/2014/12/18/naoya-matsumoto-design-crumpled-paper-grotto-bar-osaka-japan/